Evaluation and Analysis of Urban Housing Vulnerability in Metropolises Against Earthquake Crisis (A Case Study: District 4 of Shiraz City)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Salman Farsi University of Kazerun, Kazerun, Iran.
2 PhD Student, Department of Rural Planning, Faculty of Geographic Sciences and Planning, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
10.22034/jurs.2025.526808.1004
Abstract
Metropolises in Iran are vulnerable to natural disasters, including earthquakes. Due to insufficient preparedness and the lack of crisis management, an earthquake, especially in major cities, could result in high human and financial losses. Recognizing that while preventing certain crises may not be possible, mitigating their impacts is achievable, the primary objective of this study is to assess the earthquake risk level in District 4 of Shiraz City to contribute to this goal.
This research follows a descriptive-analytical methodology, with data collected through field surveys and library research. The study first identifies and selects key vulnerability indicators such as enclosure degree, building density, number of floors, and others. Subsequently, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used for layer weighting, followed by overlay operations and the development of a zoning map within the GIS environment.
The findings indicate that most of the plots in District 4 of Shiraz City fall within highly vulnerable zones. As seen in the vulnerability zoning map, the northeastern section and the western part (Koshan neighborhood) are classified as high and very high vulnerability zones, while other sections, depending on their urban texture, fall into medium to high vulnerability categories. In other parts of the district, patterns of vulnerability do not follow a specific rule.
Keywords

1. Introduction  

Earthquakes represent one of the most devastating natural hazards, posing serious risks to urban communities. Iran’s geotectonic positioning within a major seismic belt renders the country particularly vulnerable to frequent and high-magnitude seismic events. The metropolis of Shiraz, surrounded by active fault lines such as Zarghan and Qalat, faces considerable seismic exposure. Among its administrative districts, District 4 is especially susceptible due to specific physical, social, and infrastructural characteristics. This study aims to evaluate the housing vulnerability of this district using multi-criteria analysis and spatial modeling within a GIS framework. The ultimate goal is to support crisis management planning and offer targeted strategies to mitigate risk in this densely populated urban sector.

2. Materials and Methods

The research is an applied research study utilizing a descriptive–analytical methodology. Data collection encompassed field surveys, urban maps, demographic statistics, and literature reviews. Spatial analysis was conducted using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in combination with GIS tools. Key indicators included plot enclosure ratio, number of building stories, structural density, construction quality, material type, parcel dimensions, land-use adjacency, and access network configuration. Each criterion was standardized, weighted, and incorporated into an Index Overlay model to generate a seismic vulnerability map. The final output categorized the residential blocks into five classes: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high vulnerability.

3. Results and Discussion

Findings reveal that over 57% of building plots in District 4 fall within the "high" and "very high" vulnerability categories. Northeastern and western sub-zones, especially the Keshan neighborhood, exhibit elevated risk due to narrow street widths, non-engineered materials, irregular parcel layouts, and aged urban texture. Conversely, planned developments such as Valfajr Town, Kouy-e Farhangian, and other large-scale residential complexes benefit from durable construction, standardized networks, and organized layouts, placing them in lower-risk zones. Age analysis showed that 18% of buildings are older than 22 years, many constructed with low-durability or traditional materials (e.g., adobe and timber). These structures present heightened collapse risk. Social indicators such as household density (1.19 households per unit) and room occupancy rate (1.23 persons per room) further compound evacuation and emergency response challenges during an earthquake.

The district's access network is largely fragmented, with narrow, dead-end streets and corridors less than 6 meters wide. These access constraints magnify the difficulty of post-disaster rescue operations. The enclosure ratio, defined by the height of building facades relative to street width, is also notably high in older areas, reducing visibility and obstructing relief logistics. Land-use adjacency analysis revealed that residential blocks are in close proximity to hazard-prone zones such as industrial facilities, fuel stations, and critical infrastructure. This spatial incompatibility increases the likelihood of secondary disasters (e.g., fire, gas leakage). Moreover, the district displays an overall spatial heterogeneity in its urban morphology, where organic, fragmented, and large-scale patterns co-exist without a unified planning framework, a condition referred to in urban planning terminology as spatial discontinuity or uneven spatial distribution. Such inconsistencies elevate systemic risks and undermine urban resilience.

4. Conclusions

District 4 of Shiraz presents a high level of seismic vulnerability, particularly in older residential sectors characterized by irregular form, dense population, and inadequate access infrastructure. To reduce potential damages from future earthquakes, the following strategic interventions are recommended:

  • Reconstruction and structural reinforcement of deteriorated buildings using advanced technologies;
  • Reconfiguration of the access network to eliminate dead ends and widen emergency routes;
  • Designation of safe zones for the deployment of rescue and relief facilities;
  • Implementation of regulatory frameworks to manage the adjacency of hazardous land uses;
  • Promotion of public crisis awareness through education, urban drills, and citizen engagement;
  • Development of smart disaster management systems based on spatial data and predictive analytics.

This research underscores the utility of multi-criteria spatial modeling in GIS environments as a robust decision-support tool for urban crisis management and resilient planning.

Afsari, R., Nadizadeh, S., Bakhshi, A, M., Lomer, M., Homaee, J., Arsanjani, J., (2023): Using Artificial Neural Networks to Assess Earthquake Vulnerability in Urban Blocks of Tehran. Remote sensing, 15(5):1248-1248. doi: 10.3390/rs15051248.
Ahd-Nejad, M., & Jalilpour, Sh. (2011). Evaluation of external factors affecting structural vulnerability of old urban fabrics against earthquakes (Case study: District 1 of Khoy City). National Seminar on the Application of GIS in Economic, Social, and Urban Planning. [In Persian]
Badi’, P., & Rahimi, M. (2018). Assessment and measurement of urban transportation network resilience with a crisis management approach (Case study: District 2 of Tehran). New Attitudes in Human Geography, 10(2), 41–65. Dor: 20.1001.1.66972251.1397.10.2.3.3 [In Persian]
Bastami., M, Abbasnejadfard., H, Motamed., A, Ansari., A, Garakaninezhad., A (2022). Development of hybrid earthquake vulnerability functions for typical residential buildings in Iran. International journal of crisis risk reduction, 25:103087-103087. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103087
Brower, David, J & Charles, Bohl (2000): Principle and practice of hazard mitigation Emmetsburg, MD: FEMA. Emergency management higher education college course, April.
Changhai Zhai, Yonggang Zhao, WeiPing Wen, Hao Qin, LiLi Xie, (2023). A novel urban seismic resilience assessment method considering the weighting of post-earthquake loss and recovery time, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Volume 84, 2023, 103453, ISSN 2212-4209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103453.
Ghadami, M., Mahmoudzadeh, A., & Ghazi, I. (2023). Designing a strategic model for earthquake crisis management with a foresight approach aimed at reducing economic vulnerability (Case study: District 22 of Tehran). Investment Knowledge Quarterly, 12(4), 607–636. [In Persian]
Hatami-Nejad, H., et al. (2009). Assessment of seismic vulnerability levels in urban areas (Case study: District 10, Tehran Municipality). Human Geography Research, 68, 1–20. [In Persian]
Heidari, M. J. (2018). Assessment of urban fabric vulnerability to earthquake hazards (Case study: Old fabric of Zanjan City). Journal of Territorial Geo-Engineering, 2(3), 101–115. [In Persian]
Hosseinzadeh, M., Ahmadi, A., & Samadi-Foroushani, M. (2021). Developing a dynamic earthquake crisis management model for Tehran using the System Dynamics (SD) approach. Natural Environment Hazards, 10(27), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2020.33063.1617 [In Persian]
Isa-Lou, Sh., Latifi, Gh., & Goodarzi, V. (2016). Assessment of physical vulnerability of District 1 in Tehran City to probable earthquakes using the IHWP method and GIS. Geographical Information Quarterly (Sepehr), 25(100), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2017.24807 [In Persian]
Kiani, A, MoradiKuchi, and Pourtangestani, M (2017). The evaluation of the vulnerability of the urban fabric of Alishahr to earthquake using GIS software, Revista QUID (Special Issue), 2473-2477.
Lantada, N., Pujades, L., & Barbat, A. (2008). Vulnerability Index and Capacity Spectrum, Based Method for Urban Seismic Risk, Evaluation Journal of Nathazards, 51(3), 501-524, doi 10-007 11069 007-9212-4.
Mirdahaqan-Ashkezari, S. A., Al-Modarresi, S. A., Rezaei, M. R., Nowjavani-Yashneghian, M. R., & Khiazi, M. (2022). Evaluation and analysis of the vulnerability of Yazd City to earthquakes using combined models. Environmental Hazard Management Quarterly, 9(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhsci.2022.349160.747 [In Persian]
Mohammadi, J., & Rezaei, M. (2012). Spatial analysis and site selection of CNG fueling stations in Shiraz City. Spatial Planning Journal (Geography), 1(4), 111–132. [In Persian]
Moshk-Sar, P., Izadi, H., Soltani, A., & Bazrgar, M. R. (2013). Assessment of physical vulnerability of urban fabrics to earthquakes using the RADIUS method (Case study: District 3, Shiraz Municipality). Urban Planning Geography Research Journal, 1(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2013.50555 [In Persian]
Moshk-Sar, P., Soltani, A., Izadi, H., & Bazrgar, M. R. (2015). Modeling physical vulnerability of urban fabrics to earthquakes within a GIS environment (Case study: District 3, Shiraz Municipality). Urban and Regional Geography Planning, 5(14), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2015.1920 [In Persian]
Nazmfar, H., & Alavi, S. (2018). Assessment of urban building vulnerability against different earthquake intensities (Case study: District 9 of Tehran Municipality). Geographical Information Quarterly (Sepehr), 27(108), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2019.34628 [In Persian]
Park, H.H., Park, S.H., Kim, K.A. (2019). Disaster management and land administration in South Korea: Earthquakes and the real estate market, Land Use Policy, 85, pp. 52-62.
Rahman, M., Asikunnaby, Chaity, N.J. et al. Earthquake preparedness in an urban area: the case of Dhaka city, Bangladesh. Geosci. Lett. 10, 27 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-023-00281-y.
Sharif-Zadegan, M. H., & Fathi, H. (2011). Design and application of spatial models for seismic vulnerability assessment and analysis in urban planning and management. Crisis Management Journal, 46, 110–124. [In Persian]
Shiraz Municipality. (2021). Statistical Yearbook of Shiraz Municipality. Shiraz Municipality Publications. [In Persian]
Taghvai, M., Rezaei, M., & Naderi, B. (2012). Crisis management with emphasis on health-care centers (Case study: Valiasr Hospital, Kazeroon). National Conference on Sustainable Architecture and Urban Development. [In Persian]
Taheri-Amiri, M. J., Abdollahzadeh, Gh., Javaheri-Barfroushi, M., & Haghighi, F. R. (2020). Earthquake vulnerability and crisis management in Babol City using GIS software. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 7(4), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2018.121510.1491 [In Persian]
Tao, Meng., Shiyun, Xiao., Yue, Cao., Irina, Maltseva., Lingsen, Zeng. (2024). An integrated review and analysis of urban building seismic crisis management based on BIM-GIS. E3S web of conferences, 542:01013-01013. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202454201013
UNDP. (2004). Reducing Crisis Risk, A Challenge for Development.
Varethi, H. R., & Rezaei, M. (2012). Spatial analysis and site selection of accommodation centers in historical cities (Case study: Hotels in Shiraz City). Environmental Planning Journal, 5(19), 1–26. [In Persian]
Waugh, William (2000): Living with Hazards/Dealing with Crisis an Introduction to Emergency Management. Armonk, New York: M.E. sharper, Inc.
Yekrangnia, M. (2023). (3) Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Masonry Residential Buildings in the Older Parts of Tehran through Fragility Curves and Basic RVS Scores. Buildings, doi: 10.3390/buildings13020302.
Zangi-Abadi, A., Rezaei, M., Momeni-Shahraki, M., & Mirzaei, S. (2013). Assessment of vulnerability in the central districts of Iranian metropolises against earthquakes using the IHWP model (Case study: District 3 of Isfahan City). Geospatial Analysis Journal, 3(8). [In Persian]

  • Receive Date 28 May 2025
  • Revise Date 01 June 2025
  • Accept Date 12 June 2025
  • First Publish Date 12 June 2025
  • Publish Date 23 July 2025